24 Nov Public transport accessibility accounting for level of service and competition for urban opportunities: An equity analysis for education in Santiago de Chile
|Public transport accessibility accounting for level of service and competition for urban opportunities: An equity analysis for education in Santiago de Chile|
|Author||Ignacio Tiznado-Aitkena; Juan Carlos Muñoz; Ricardo Hurtubia|
|Line(s)||Access and Mobility|
|Year of Publication||2020|
|Journal Title||Journal of Transport Geography|
Accessibility, Perceived accessibility, Education, Level of service, Equity, Public transport
Several cities around the world have changed their transportation planning paradigm, understanding that the prime goal is to provide access to opportunities for everyone. To address this goal, public transport plays a fundamental role and, therefore, it is key for developing a sustainable and equitable city.
This paper proposes a methodology to analyze access to opportunities through public transport incorporating the user’s valuation of attributes that impact the level of service on his/her trip and the competitiveness for urban opportunities. Using data from Santiago, Chile, we applied the proposed methodology to analyze accessibility to higher-quality public primary schools. We compare total travel time (TTT) with a proposed measure of total generalized travel time (TGTT) using simple potential and competitive accessibility indicators, accounting for the subjective valuation of walking time, travel time, waiting time, comfort and transfers, and translating them into in-vehicle time units.
We find that the inclusion of competition has a more substantial impact than including the subjective valuation of the level of service in the accessibility to educational opportunities. Using competitive measures with TGTT, we found that around 20% of the zones in Santiago have at least a 50% deficit of higher-quality public education, and 71% of them are in peripheral areas. Furthermore, these zones, where medium and low-income population usually lives, can experience, on average, 1–2 transfers, 4–5 passengers per square meter, and 15-min waiting. We conclude that the proposed methodology provides a more comprehensive way to understand accessibility by incorporating the traveling experience, allowing to determine how and where to intervene to effectively improve accessibility, with a focus on urban equity.
|Corresponding Author||Ignacio Tiznado-Aitkena firstname.lastname@example.org; Juan Carlos Muñoz email@example.com; Ricardo Hurtubia firstname.lastname@example.org|